Jump to content

Quantified Self: Difference between revisions

From Archive
Add Navbox Life
Added archaeology vs optimization framing, compounding value section
 
Line 13: Line 13:
=== API-First Approach ===
=== API-First Approach ===
Priority is given to services that offer data egress capabilities, avoiding platforms that create data lock-in. This ensures long-term access to personal information regardless of platform changes.
Priority is given to services that offer data egress capabilities, avoiding platforms that create data lock-in. This ensures long-term access to personal information regardless of platform changes.
== Archaeology vs. Optimization ==
The fundamental question driving this approach is '''not''' "How do I optimize myself?" but rather '''What patterns exist that I can't see?'''
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Optimization Thinking !! Archaeology Thinking
|-
| Track → measure → improve → repeat || Capture → store → analyze when curious
|-
| Assumes current metrics matter || No assumption about what matters
|-
| Creates performance pressure || No pressure to "improve"
|-
| Can distort behavior (Goodhart's Law) || Reveals actual patterns
|}
=== Why Archaeology? ===
'''Optimization thinking''' assumes you know what matters. It's prescriptive - it changes behavior in pursuit of predetermined goals.
'''Archaeology thinking''' reveals what actually happened. It's descriptive - patterns emerge that you couldn't have predicted or measured intentionally.
''Example:'' Started tracking typing speed to "improve" - realized typing is already fast enough. The real bottleneck is thinking, not typing. Stopped optimizing the wrong thing.
=== The Capture Pattern ===
All personal data systems follow the same architecture:
# '''Capture automatically''' (no friction)
# '''Store long-term''' (years of data)
# '''Analyze occasionally''' (when curious)
# '''Reveal patterns''' (that were invisible in daily use)
What these systems '''don't''' do: judge you, gamify improvement, push notifications, create anxiety.
=== Compounding Value ===
* '''Year 1:''' Data collection feels pointless. No patterns visible.
* '''Year 3:''' Starting to see recurring themes. Can answer "when did I..." questions.
* '''Year 10:''' Rich historical context. Embeddings reveal invisible connections. Your own personal time machine.
''The key insight: value compounds over years, not months. Capture > analysis. Curiosity > improvement. Patterns emerge when you're not looking.''


== Technical Architecture ==
== Technical Architecture ==

Latest revision as of 14:32, 18 January 2026

Quantified Self is a personal data aggregation and analysis system designed around the philosophy of owning your data while providing meaningful context for AI systems and self-improvement tracking.

Philosophy

The core principles of this quantified self approach are:

AI Context Enhancement

Rich personal data serves as contextual information for language models, enabling more personalized and relevant AI interactions based on actual behavioral patterns rather than assumptions.

Data Sovereignty

The system emphasizes personal data ownership rather than feeding information into surveillance platforms or data silos. Users maintain control over their information and can choose how to utilize it.

API-First Approach

Priority is given to services that offer data egress capabilities, avoiding platforms that create data lock-in. This ensures long-term access to personal information regardless of platform changes.

Archaeology vs. Optimization

The fundamental question driving this approach is not "How do I optimize myself?" but rather What patterns exist that I can't see?

Optimization Thinking Archaeology Thinking
Track → measure → improve → repeat Capture → store → analyze when curious
Assumes current metrics matter No assumption about what matters
Creates performance pressure No pressure to "improve"
Can distort behavior (Goodhart's Law) Reveals actual patterns

Why Archaeology?

Optimization thinking assumes you know what matters. It's prescriptive - it changes behavior in pursuit of predetermined goals.

Archaeology thinking reveals what actually happened. It's descriptive - patterns emerge that you couldn't have predicted or measured intentionally.

Example: Started tracking typing speed to "improve" - realized typing is already fast enough. The real bottleneck is thinking, not typing. Stopped optimizing the wrong thing.

The Capture Pattern

All personal data systems follow the same architecture:

  1. Capture automatically (no friction)
  2. Store long-term (years of data)
  3. Analyze occasionally (when curious)
  4. Reveal patterns (that were invisible in daily use)

What these systems don't do: judge you, gamify improvement, push notifications, create anxiety.

Compounding Value

  • Year 1: Data collection feels pointless. No patterns visible.
  • Year 3: Starting to see recurring themes. Can answer "when did I..." questions.
  • Year 10: Rich historical context. Embeddings reveal invisible connections. Your own personal time machine.

The key insight: value compounds over years, not months. Capture > analysis. Curiosity > improvement. Patterns emerge when you're not looking.

Technical Architecture

The system is built around a personal API located at a centralized endpoint that aggregates data from various services. The architecture employs intelligent caching strategies:

  • Health data: Updated every 4 hours
  • Development activity: Hourly updates
  • Music listening: 30-minute refresh cycles
  • Other metrics: Variable based on data volatility

Data Categories

Health & Fitness

  • Apple Health metrics including steps, exercise minutes, and heart rate variability
  • Long-term movement pattern analysis (10+ years of data)
  • Sleep quality and recovery tracking

Productivity & Development

  • GitHub contribution patterns and commit history analysis
  • RescueTime productivity analytics and time allocation
  • Coding time distribution across different projects and languages

Skills & Gaming

  • Chess rating progression and puzzle-solving statistics
  • Programming problem-solving metrics from platforms like LeetCode
  • Typing speed improvements and accuracy tracking
  • Gaming performance analytics across different platforms

Creative Output

  • Photography platform statistics and engagement metrics
  • Music listening history with decade-plus tracking through Last.fm
  • Writing output monitoring and productivity patterns

Implementation Goals

The primary objectives of the system are:

  1. Improvement Tracking: Monitoring metrics that can demonstrate progress over time
  2. AI Context: Providing language models with actual behavioral data for more accurate responses
  3. Personal Insights: Understanding patterns in behavior, productivity, and health
  4. Data Independence: Maintaining control over personal information

Privacy and Control

The system is designed with privacy as a foundational principle. Data aggregation occurs on personally controlled infrastructure, and sharing is selective and intentional rather than automatic or required by platform terms of service.

Categories


🚀 Projects
Active Projects · FPV Drones · NOAA Satellites · Website
Tools Scrapbook-core · Exif-photo-printer · Coach Artie · Dataviz
Hardware Meshtastic · HackRF · Flipper Zero
Frameworks Timeline Viz · LLM Eval · Sensemaking Systems


Daily Life
Sustenance Food · Coffee · Cooking · Foraging
Body Exercise Philosophy · Habits · Winter Training
Place Hudson Valley · Weather · Local Resources
Systems Supply Chain · Quantified Self · Automation